The article underneath has been published in the daily newspaper Le Journal de Saône-et-Loire, France, le 22 février 2007.
|
|
February 17, 2007 at 08:00 p.m., ("Saturday evening ), Venus was at azimuth 261°28' and an elevation of 4°24' there, with a particularly strong brightness in those days since 89 % of its surface were lit by the sun. In fact, Venus was so much remarkably brilliant and quite visible there in these days that I had myself taken some time in evening to gaze at it, thinkking that with such brightness, UFO reports would possibly come up...
And of course, just like described by the former mayor, it slowly descended with rotation of the Earth to disappear behind the horizon, towards 20:20.
Still as the former mayor reported, the next day, as he looked at it earlier, he could observe it longer, and take photographs.
And on the fourth day, the former mayor does provide an explanation of the "disappearance" of the supposed UFO: "Since, it disappeared, or then there were too many clouds."
These photographs which he took using the zoom with a digital camera seem to show some other thing than Venus; but it is not the case: quite simply the very shake when the zoom is used simply accounts for this effect, as everyone can check with his/her own camera. It is not at all a trace of a move of the UFO, but a trace of the move of the camera.
The newspaper mentions a "witness in the newspaper of Monday" speaking about something "like a flight of starlings"; but in addition to the photographs which show in fact Venus and do not resemble at all a photographs of a flight of birds, it is not the same witness nor the same observation, as will be specified in the issue of the newspaper the next day.